Michal Adamczyk

Name: Michal Adamczyk
Address: NL
Rating: 4.8

Accountant · Netherlands

4.8PLNL

Certified by Koninklijke Nederlandse Beroepsorganisatie van Accountants (NBA)

Netherlands · Active since 2013

Verified by EXPAT LEGAL

Last verified: April 2026 · Annual re-verification scheduled

How we verify

About the specialist

Working online with the Polish community across the Netherlands, I handle ZZP sole-trader registration, taxation for remote workers, social contributions and payroll. My aim is simple: clear numbers, met deadlines and no surprises from the Belastingdienst.

Practice areas

Self-Employment Registration
Remote Worker Taxation
Social Contributions
Payroll

81 consultations completedOn platform since January 2026

Book a consultation

The consultation fee is credited toward the cost of the work if you decide to go ahead.

Choose a consultation format

Online consultation€115Connect by chat or video call. Pick written Q&A for quick document questions, or a 30–60 minute video call for complex situations that need back-and-forth discussion — the specialist sends you the link.

Email for the consultationPhone number (optional)

Optional. International format with country code, e.g. +48 600 000 000.

Shared only with your chosen specialist. Never sold or used for marketing.

You pay for the consultation now — this isn't a callback request. Your money is held in escrow and released to the specialist only after you confirm the service.

A clear review of your situation and documents
An honest assessment of your options and chances
An estimate of what the work will cost and how long it takes
A clear plan of the next steps to take

If the specialist can't take your case, you're refunded automatically — no explanation needed.

EXPAT LEGAL Protection

Payment held until the service is confirmed
100% refund within 3 business days
Verified specialist guaranteed

Consultations are professional advisory services and do not establish attorney-client privilege or ongoing representation. Court representation requires a separate retainer agreement.

Something wrong? Report a concern