Oleh Melnyk

Name: Oleh Melnyk
Address: PL
Rating: 4.7

Lawyer · Poland

4.7UAPL

Licensed by Okręgowa Izba Radców Prawnych

Poland · Active since 2015

Verified by EXPAT LEGAL

Last verified: March 2026 · Annual re-verification scheduled

How we verify

About the specialist

Oleh is an online lawyer working with Ukrainian- and Polish-speaking clients across Poland, focusing on employment disputes and contract review, from unpaid wages and unlawful termination to scrutinising job offers before signature. He reads the fine print so nothing in a contract catches his clients off guard.

Practice areas

Labour Dispute
Contract Review

49 consultations completedOn platform since March 2026

Book a consultation

The consultation fee is credited toward the cost of the work if you decide to go ahead.

Choose a consultation format

Online consultation400 złConnect by chat or video call. Pick written Q&A for quick document questions, or a 30–60 minute video call for complex situations that need back-and-forth discussion — the specialist sends you the link.

Email for the consultationPhone number (optional)

Optional. International format with country code, e.g. +48 600 000 000.

Shared only with your chosen specialist. Never sold or used for marketing.

You pay for the consultation now — this isn't a callback request. Your money is held in escrow and released to the specialist only after you confirm the service.

A clear review of your situation and documents
An honest assessment of your options and chances
An estimate of what the work will cost and how long it takes
A clear plan of the next steps to take

If the specialist can't take your case, you're refunded automatically — no explanation needed.

EXPAT LEGAL Protection

Payment held until the service is confirmed
100% refund within 3 business days
Verified specialist guaranteed

Consultations are professional advisory services and do not establish attorney-client privilege or ongoing representation. Court representation requires a separate retainer agreement.

Something wrong? Report a concern