Olha Shevchenko

Name: Olha Shevchenko
Address: PL
Rating: 4.8

Lawyer · Poland

4.8UAPL

Licensed by Okręgowa Izba Radców Prawnych

Warsaw, Poland · Active since 2012

Verified by EXPAT LEGAL

Last verified: April 2026 · Annual re-verification scheduled

How we verify

About the specialist

Criminal defence attorney in Warsaw representing Ukrainian-speaking clients facing charges or investigation in Poland. She stands by you from the first questioning to the verdict, ensuring your rights are respected at every stage.

Practice areas

Criminal Defence

70 consultations completedOn platform since November 2025

Book a consultation

The consultation fee is credited toward the cost of the work if you decide to go ahead.

Choose a consultation format

Online consultation820 złConnect by chat or video call. Pick written Q&A for quick document questions, or a 30–60 minute video call for complex situations that need back-and-forth discussion — the specialist sends you the link.In-person meeting940 złFace-to-face at the specialist's office. Needed for document signing, notarisation and court preparation.

Email for the consultationPhone number (optional)

Optional. International format with country code, e.g. +48 600 000 000.

Shared only with your chosen specialist. Never sold or used for marketing.

You pay for the consultation now — this isn't a callback request. Your money is held in escrow and released to the specialist only after you confirm the service.

A clear review of your situation and documents
An honest assessment of your options and chances
An estimate of what the work will cost and how long it takes
A clear plan of the next steps to take

If the specialist can't take your case, you're refunded automatically — no explanation needed.

EXPAT LEGAL Protection

Payment held until the service is confirmed
100% refund within 3 business days
Verified specialist guaranteed

Consultations are professional advisory services and do not establish attorney-client privilege or ongoing representation. Court representation requires a separate retainer agreement.

Something wrong? Report a concern